Crypto Strategy · · 4 min read

The Subsidiary Mandate: Inside the NCUA’s New Stablecoin Blueprint

The NCUA has spoken: Direct issuance is out; CUSOs are in. As "SaveBots" begin moving billions in deposits, we analyze the new regulatory blueprint and the "Parent, Partner, or Pipe" choice facing every Board.

The Subsidiary Mandate: Inside the NCUA’s New Stablecoin Blueprint

Seven months after President Trump signed the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act into law on July 18, 2025, the industry has shifted from theoretical debate to high-stakes implementation. As of February 16, 2026, the regulatory blueprint for credit unions has finally been unveiled. This briefing analyzes the new realities emerging as regulated stablecoins, Real-World Asset (RWA) tokenization, and Agentic AI converge to redefine the credit union business model.

I. The Regulatory Milestone: The NCUA's "Subsidiary Only" Mandate

On February 12, 2026, the National Credit Union Administration (NCUA) published its proposed rule, Investments in and Licensing of Permitted Payment Stablecoin Issuers (PPSIs) (91 FR 6531). This proposal provides the first structural clarity for credit unions under the GENIUS Act.

A. The Separation of Risk

The NCUA has established a clear boundary: Direct issuance is prohibited. The GENIUS Act and the NCUA's proposal explicitly bar federally insured credit unions (FICUs) from issuing payment stablecoins directly on their own balance sheets. Instead, participation must occur through a separately licensed subsidiary designated as an NCUA-licensed PPSI. For Federal Credit Unions (FCUs), this effectively mandates a Credit Union Service Organization (CUSO) structure, as the NCUA reaffirmed that services tied to routine credit union operations must meet Part 712 requirements.

B. The "Parent Company" Joint Application

A major feature of the February 2026 rule is the joint application requirement. If a FICU owns, controls, or holds the power to vote 10% or more of any class of a PPSI's voting securities, it is defined as a "Parent Company".

C. The Implementation Gap

It is critical for boards to note that this rule focuses only on licensing and investment structure. It does not yet define operational standards—such as specific capital ratios, reserve management rules, or cybersecurity mandates. These "Phase 2" standards will be addressed in forthcoming rulemakings required by July 18, 2026.

II. What's New: The $300 Billion Market and the AI Catalyst

While the NCUA builds the "rails," the market has already scaled. Total stablecoin supply has exceeded $300 billion. Tether (USDT) continues to lead with a circulating supply of over $186 billion, while USDC sits at approximately $75 billion.

A. The Looming $6.6 Trillion "Interest Loophole"

The primary threat to credit union liquidity remains the "interest loophole" in the GENIUS Act. While the Act bans issuers from paying interest, it does not explicitly prohibit affiliates—such as exchanges or digital wallets—from offering yield-like "rewards" or activity-linked incentives.

B. The Rise of "SaveBots" and Agentic Commerce

The most profound shift since 2025 is the arrival of Agentic AI—autonomous systems capable of making financial decisions and executing transactions without human intervention.

III. Core Strategic Questions for Your Credit Union

In light of the NCUA’s February 2026 proposed rule and the evolving market, credit union boards must answer four foundational questions:

  1. "Are we a Parent, a Partner, or a Pipe?" The NCUA’s joint-application mandate for 10%+ owners carries significant regulatory responsibility. Does your credit union have the scale to act as a "Parent Company" for a CUSO-based PPSI, or should you focus on a partnership model where you act as a trusted "off-ramp" for third-party tokens?
  2. "How will we defend against 'The End of Inertia'?" As AI agents (SaveBots) begin to optimize member funds 24/7/365, the tradition of relying on "member loyalty" for low-cost deposits is disappearing. Does your credit union have a strategy to offer its own yield-bearing, tokenized products or RWA platforms to capture these funds before they leave your ecosystem?
  3. "Is our core ready for 24/7 money movement?" The NCUA positions stablecoin issuance as regulated payment infrastructure. If commerce migrates to these rails, can your legacy core processor handle real-time settlement, or do you need a "Coin2Core" bridge to make digital assets visible within your core banking environment?
  4. "What is our Digital Custody posture?" The NCUA has clarified that while credit unions have custodial authority, stablecoins are not deposits and are not insured. How will you communicate the trust advantage of a "credit union vault" to members who want to safely "HODL" digital assets within your trusted perimeter?

IV. Conclusion: The Pivot to Action

The 60-day comment period for the NCUA’s proposed rule ends April 13, 2026. This is the final window for the industry to influence the operational standards that will determine the feasibility of credit union participation.

The "wait-and-see" approach is no longer tenable. With the market at $300 billion and AI agents beginning to autonomously manage member wallets, the window to act is closing. Success in 2026 and beyond belongs to the institutions that stop viewing stablecoins as a speculative asset and start viewing them as the inevitable infrastructure of a real-time financial system.

This analysis is published by Glatt Consulting Insights for informational purposes. It is intended to spark and inspire strategic discussion about the future evolution of the credit union industry. The content is based on publicly available information and data as of its publication date and may contain inaccuracies or omissions.

This paper is a product of Gemini Deep Research and should not be construed as strict financial, legal, or strategic advice. Readers should conduct their own due diligence before making any strategic decisions.

Read next